The White House’s decision to authorize troops to use lethal force at the border was met with much criticism. There was also no consensus on the order with Politico reporting Team Trump was divided on the issue.
The alleged dissenters were Chief of Staff John Kelly and DHS head Kirstjen Nielsen. The duo frequently find themselves at odds with Trump’s more aggressive advisers like Stephen Miller and Chris Crane.
Kelly and Nielson reportedly engaged in a fierce debate with Border Patrol chief Brandon Judd, Miller and Crane. Apparently, Defense Secretary, James Mattis, was also unaware that this type of decree would be delivered.
Kelly and Nielsen were particularly upset about how they were tied to the order. Kelly’s signature was used to authorize the declaration while Nielsen is vested control of the military action.
The declaration was also advised against by White House counsel Emmet Flood. The counsel, “cautioned that it was likely to run into constitutional roadblocks.”
When James Mattis was asked about the the order, he said, “I have the authority. But we are not even employing, you’ve seen the picture of the guys down there not carrying guns, so relax. Don’t worry about it.”
The authorization of lethal force can be seen as another White House win for adviser Stephen Miller. Miller was seen as the architect of the controversial family separation policy.
Politico says of the declaration, “It’s an indication of the extent to which immigration policy in the Trump White House is engineered by a small group of hawks, including Miller — and, as a result, has often caught other stakeholders off guard.”
What's Your Reaction?
Todd Neikirk is a New Jersey based politics and technology writer. His work has been featured in psfk.com, foxsports.com and Pet Lifestyles Magazine. He enjoys sports, politics, technology and spending time at the shore with his family.