If you had “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Supports Legal Marijuana” on your 2021 Bingo card, go ahead and fill in that square.
Thomas, one of the Supreme Court’s most conservative justices, said on Monday that because of the piecemeal nature of federal policies on marijuana, federal laws against its use or cultivation may no longer make sense. Thomas said the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2005 upholding federal laws making marijuana possession illegal may now be out of date.
“A prohibition on interstate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer be necessary or proper to support the federal government’s piecemeal approach,” Justice Thomas wrote in his opinion.
Thirty-six states now allow medical marijuana, and 18 also allow recreational use. But federal tax law does not allow marijuana businesses to deduct their business expenses. Thomas shared his opinion after SCOTUS declined to hear the appeal of a Colorado medical marijuana dispensary that was denied federal tax breaks that other businesses are allowed.
“Federal policies of the past 16 years have greatly undermined its reasoning,” Justice Thomas said. “The federal government’s current approach is a half-in, half-out regime that simultaneously tolerates and forbids local use of marijuana.”
On page 31, Clarence Thomas says a federal marijuana ban may now be unconstitutional. https://t.co/nOkXXWF0JE
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) June 28, 2021
The Department of Justice has instructed the nation’s federal prosecutors not to pursue cases against marijuana businesses that follow state law. And since 2015, Congress has prohibited the Justice Department from spending federal money to prevent states from carrying out their own laws.
Bwahahahaha Clarence Thomas just announced he wants to decriminalize marijuana federally, have fun wrestling with something liberals will LOVE, you traitorous insurrectionist #LegalizeIt https://t.co/57sdjVqDQb
— T👻r👻 D🐈⬛bl💀n 🎃🧙🏻♀️ (@taradublinrocks) June 28, 2021
However, the IRS continues to enforce its own rules against growers and dealers. “Under this rule, a business that is still in the red after it pays its workers and keeps the lights on might nonetheless owe substantial federal income tax,” Thomas said. He added that the federal government’s “willingness to look the other way on marijuana is more episodic than coherent.”
WOW: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas issued a scathing statement slamming the federal government’s “contradictory” and “unstable”position on marijuana and suggesting that national cannabis prohibition may be unconstitutional.https://t.co/jJJRlDLYgg pic.twitter.com/YncfSTySkD
— Tom Angell 🌳📰ⓥ (@tomangell) June 28, 2021